Google Talking To New York Times, Washington Post About… Something | Peter Kafka | MediaMemo | AllThingsD

Remember last week, when Google was forced to explain why it wasn’t single-handedly destroying American newspapers?

Turns out the company is in talks with some of the country’s biggest newspapers to… well, save them isn’t the right phrase. In fact, it’s not clear how to describe the talks. But we do know that Google GOOG is chatting with both the Washington Post WPO and the New York Times NYT, because that’s what employees of the Washington Post and the New York Times are reporting today.

Here’s the Post’s Howard Kurtz, in column this morning castigating newspapers for being too slow to react to the Web:

Post Co. chief executive Donald Graham and Google chief executive Eric Schmidt and their lieutenants have been holding talks about a possible collaboration. This could range from creating new Web pages to technological tools for journalists or readers. Hanging over the talks is the reality that the search giant, while funneling vital traffic to news sites, vacuums up their content without paying a dime.

Post executive Philip Bennett confirmed the discussions, saying: “We’re talking to each other about improved ways of creating and presenting news online.” He calls it “an informal collaboration” that “has produced some interesting ideas already. I’d say that on the journalism side of the conversation we’ve learned a lot.”

Here’s a Google spokesperson’s description of the meeting, for what it’s worth: “This was an informal meeting, and we’re always talking with publishers to find new and creative ways to help them make money from compelling online content.”

Today’s idea: Brevity has a noble line …

Today’s idea: Brevity has a noble lineage, from the aphorisms of the ancient Greeks to “The Elements of Style” by Strunk and White. So why bemoan the rise of Twitter?

Language | People are giving the micro-blogging service Twitter a hard time “for attention-span erosion that will hasten our descent into duh, stupidness,” writes Ryan Bigge at The Smart Set. For example, Samantha Bee of “The Daily Show” mocked Twitter’s 140-character limit with “Grunter” — since “not all my followers have time to read my entire tweet.”

Very funny. But concision has a “long, proud history,” Bigge notes, from the koans paradoxical sayings of Asian antiquity to the telegraphic wit of the New Yorker humorist Robert Benchley on a visit to Venice: “STREETS FULL OF WATER. PLEASE ADVISE.”

True, brevity can limit range of thought. But just as the sitcom has not replaced opera, Twitter will not replace the paragraph, the writer contends, “only publicly demonstrate concision’s vices and virtues.” [Smart Set]

via Reading the Web – Idea of the Day Blog – NYTimes.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.