Facebook Raises $200M; Now Valued at $10…

Facebook Raises $200M; Now Valued at $10 Billion – http://bit.ly/44glfm @mashable @tweetmeme

I feel the potential is such that at lea…

I feel the potential is such that at least the Daredevils will start earning closer to 300 crores from edition 3 http://tr.im/ipldeccan

IPL Brand Valuations – New Age Marketing Paradigm | livemint.com

R P Singh - A stock , An IPL phenomenon

R P Singh - A stock , An IPL phenomenon

ROYAL CHALLENGERS BANGALORE
Owners: United Spirits Ltd
Team captain: Kevin Pietersen (first six matches), Anil Kumble (for the remaining)
Franchisee fee: $111.6 mn
Brand value: $14 mn
Brand score: 50%
Sponsorships/brand associations: Wrigley’s and mostly in-house brands such as Kingfisher
Income from central pool: 2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from team sponsorships: 2008: Not applicable, as all were in-house brands
2009: Rs10 crore
Total: 2008: Rs35 crore
2009: Rs86.5 crore
Restructuring shows results
From being a laggard in the first season to runner-up this year, Royal Challengers Bangalore was a spectacular success story in IPL 2. And if there was one star the team owed its success to, it was its flamboyant owner, liquor baron Vijay Mallya. After the team’s poor show in the first season, Mallya restructured his team and redefined its key result areas. His personal charisma added to the team’s brand appeal, says the MTI study.
“RCB had a lot of glamour associated with it as it had cheerleaders from the Washington Redskins as its own cheerleaders, and the glamour quotient was furthered by the presence of (actor) Katrina Kaif as the brand ambassador,” it says. The study pegged the brand value of Mallya’s team at $14 million (around Rs66.08 crore), but this is sure to pick up after this year’s comeback.
The team has not had too many sponsors but the owners say that was a conscious strategy.
**********************
RAJASTHAN ROYALS
Owners: Jaipur IPL Cricket Pvt. Ltd
Team captain: Shane Warne
Franchisee fee: $67 mn
Brand value: $10 mn
Brand score: 47%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least nine; UltraTech Cement, Kingfisher, Royal Challenge, HDFC Standard Life, Puma, 7Up, TCS, Boost, Wrigley’s, fashion designer Kunal Rawal
Income from central pool:
2008:Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from sponsorships:
2008: Rs15 crore
2009: Rs100-110 crore
Total*:
2008: Rs50 crore
2009: Rs176.5-186.5 crore
Defending champions lose steam, gain ground in getting sponsorships
Rajasthan Royals surprised everyone when it stole the show in 2008. It was the least expensive team and its owners Jaipur IPL Cricket Pvt. Ltd did little to change the frugal image, with no marketing buzz and no celebrity endorser.
Winning the tournament in 2008 helped Rajasthan Royals attract bigger sponsors this year. The absence of star players, lesser-known owners and no brand ambassador last year combined to prevent it from creating a differentiated brand identity, but all that changed after the win. This year, the team’s glamour quotient went up when Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty, with partner Raj Kundra, bought a 12% stake for $16.8 million, pushing the team’s total valuation to $140 million, against the $67 million the team owners had spent to buy it.
All this helped the team attract new sponsors, nine against four last year. The MTI study pegged Rajasthan Royals’ brand value at $10 million (around Rs47.2 crore), the lowest among all teams. Things may be worse next year given the team’s lacklustre performance this time.
**********************
MUMBAI INDIANS
Owners: Reliance Industries Ltd
Team captain: Sachin Tendulkar
Franchisee fee: $111.9 mn
Brand value: $17 mn
Brand score: 51%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least 13, including MasterCard, Idea Cellular, Royal Stag, Kingfisher, Pepsi, Adidas, Zandu Balm, Red FM, Wrigley’s and Luminous Technology
Income from central pool:
2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from team sponsorships:
2008: Rs15 crore
2009: Rs80-90 crore
Total*:
2008: Rs50 crore
2009: Rs156.5-166.5 crore
An average showing, loyalty factor driven by icon Tendulkar
The most expensive team, Mumbai Indians, bought by Reliance Industries Ltd, had an average run in IPL, both in terms of performance and valuation. Stuck in the middle of the grid, Mumbai Indians was eliminated at the quarter-final stage in both seasons.
The team, however, managed to attract an impressive number of sponsors this year. The MTI study put its brand value at $17 million (around Rs80.24 crore), the fourth highest in the league.
Although Bollywood actor Hrithik Roshan did lend himself to marketing initiatives through music videos and advertisements in 2008, it was icon player Sachin Tendulkar who really drove the loyalty factor for the team and brought in brands such as MasterCard, Pepsi and Adidas, among others.
The team’s biggest strength, according to the MTI study, was its huge fan following among cricket lovers.
**********************
KINGS XI PUNJAB
Owners: Preity Zinta, Ness Wadia and Mohit Burman
Team captain: Yuvraj Singh
Franchisee fee: $76 mn
Brand value: $15 mn
Brand score: 54%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least nine; Emirates, Gulf Oil, Reebok, Springbok International, Nimbooz, Netlinkblue, Royal Challenge, Dabur Glucose-D, Orbit
Income from central pool:
2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from team sponsorships:
2008: Rs15-18 crore
2009: Rs50-55 crore
Total*:
2008: Rs50-53 crore
2009: Rs126.5-129.5 crore
Zinta brought in advertisers; consistency won loyalty
More than its performance on the pitch, Mohali’s Kings XI Punjab is known for its perky co-owner, Bollywood actor Preity Zinta. The team’s performance in both seasons was average. Although the team made it to the semi-finals in 2008, this year it was eliminated at an earlier stage. The MTI report valued the team at $15 million (around Rs70.8 crore), fifth from the top in the list of franchisees.
“With consistent performance throughout the season, the team was able to attract consistent audience numbers and developed a loyal viewership,” the report says.
Zinta’s association with several brands as their ambassador helped the team get several sponsors and it is likely to have earned about Rs55 crore in sponsorships this year. Popular cricketers such as Brett Lee and Yuvraj Singh also upped the ante of the team.
**********************
KOLKATA KNIGHT RIDERS
Owners: Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt. Ltd
Team captain: Brendon McCullum
Franchisee fee: $75.09 mn
Brand value: $22 mn
Brand score: 52%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least 12; Nokia, Belmonte, Star Plus, Gitanjali Jewellers, Sprite, Boomer, Reebok, Bilt, Tag Heuer, PlanetM, Next
Income from central pool:
2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from sponsorships:
2008: Rs30 crore
2009: Rs90-100 crore
Total:
2008: Rs65 crore
2009: Rs166.5-176.5 crore
Brand value upped by Khan, likely to be most profitable this time too
It did not have a good run on the field last year and this year, Kolkata Knight Riders, or KKR, was the first team to be ousted from the IPL. Yet the team with Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan, or SRK, as its owner topped the league in terms of brand value.
The MTI study pegged the team’s brand value at $22 million (Rs103.84 crore), 16% more than the second highest team with a brand value of $19 million. “The Shah Rukh Khan brand and the in-stadium marketing strategies of the teams have influenced the team’s brand value, resulting in higher income from gate receipts, merchandising revenues and attracting new team sponsors,” says the study.
The team’s below-average performance on the ground notwithstanding, KKR had the maximum buzz mainly because of SRK’s personal charisma and partly because of team member Saurav Ganguly. This year, an anonymous blogger, Fakeiplplayer, who wrote about KKR’s “inside story”, also kept the brand name bustling. The result: It was reported to be the most profitable team last year, and is likely to have repeated the feat this time as well.
**********************
CHENNAI SUPER KINGS
Owners: India Cements Ltd
Team captain: M.S. Dhoni
Franchisee fee: $91 mn
Brand value: $18 mn
Brand score: 53%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least 15; Aircel, Cloud 9, Nivaran 90, Reebok, 7Up, Band-Aid, Peter England, Nivea, Lays, Orbit, Boomer, Star Vijay, Hello, Big Bazaar, Coromandel King
Income from central pool:
2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from team sponsorships:
2008: Rs20 crore
2009: Rs100-110 crore
Total*:
2008: Rs55 crore
2009: Rs176.5-186.5 crore
Dhoni key in creating a strong brand
Last year’s runner-up and this year’s semi-finalist, Chennai Super Kings successfully delivered what its owners, India Cements Ltd, expected it to—creating brand awareness for the holding company. “IPL has given us a pan-India presence and strengthened our brand name in southern India,” Rakesh Singh, chief marketing officer of the team, had said earlier.
The brand, according to the MTI study, enjoyed a strong valuation at $18 million (around Rs85 crore), the third highest among the eight teams. With Mahendra Singh Dhoni as the captain and icon player, the brand benefited from his associations with brands such as Aircel, Reebok, Big Bazaar and 7Up.
“The purchase of M.S. Dhoni, under whose captaincy India won the world T20 championship, was the key factor in creating a large awareness, a stronger perception and gave great mileage for creating a strong brand for Chennai Super Kings,” says the study.
**********************
DELHI DAREDEVILS
Owners: GMR Holdings Pvt. Ltd
Team captain: Virender Sehwag
Franchisee fee: $84 mn
Brand value: $19 mn
Brand score: 55%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least 13; Hero Honda, Kingfisher, Royal Challenge, Coca-Cola, Adidas, Fever 104 FM, Orbit, IBN7, CNN IBN, Cricketnext.com, designer Karan Nasir, Buzzintown.com
Income from central pool:
2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from sponsorships:
2008: Rs15 crore
2009: Rs60 crore
Total*:
2008: Rs50 crore
2009: Rs136.5 crore
A balanced team, Sehwag’s popularity generated advertiser interest
The MTI study valued the Delhi Daredevils brand at $19 million (around Rs89.68 crore), the second highest among the eight teams. The reason: A strong squad, a popular brand ambassador (in 2008) and a well-known owner helped Delhi Daredevils create a good awareness and perception about the team, it says.

Even cricket experts hailed Delhi Daredevils as one of the most balanced teams on the field.
Owned by Bangalore-based infrastructure and construction group GMR Holdings Pvt. Ltd, the team established itself as a serious player with strong performances in both the first and second seasons of IPL.
The popularity of captain Virender Sehwag, along with Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar as the face of the team in 2008, helped it build a loyal fan base and generated interest among advertisers.
According to industry estimates, the team generated Rs15 crore in sponsorships in 2008, and this was likely to have increased to Rs60 crore this year, thanks to the deals signed with brands such as Coca-Cola, Fever 104 FM and Kingfisher Airlines.
**********************
DECCAN CHARGERS
Owners: Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd
Team captain: Adam Gilchrist
Franchisee fee: $107.01 mn
Current brand value: $11 mn
Current brand score: 44%
Sponsorships/brand associations: At least nine, including Odyssey, Puma, Kingfisher, McDowell’s, Big 92.7 FM, Boomer, Pepsi, Serendipity Tours
Income from central pool:
2008: Rs35 crore
2009: approx. Rs76.5 crore
Income from team sponsorships:
2008: Rs20 crore
2009: Rs50 crore
Total*:
2008: Rs55 crore
2009: Rs126.5 crore
Valuations remained low but win may change things
The team was, indeed, all charged up this year. Beating Royal Challengers by six runs in the final, the Deccan Chargers team not only scored in terms of popularity, but also made its team owners, Hyderabad-based media company, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd richer by the Rs4.8 crore that it won in prize money.
The team’s valuation at $11 million (around Rs52 crore) was, however, not too impressive. The absence of a popular brand ambassador, lower awareness about its owners and fewer marketing and branding efforts prevented Deccan Chargers from building a popular brand, says the MTI study.
However, there was enough advertiser interest in the team this year, with the number of brand associations jumping from five to nine.
The team owners have been keen to sell a strategic stake in the team, but had not found any takers at the price they were quoting. This may now change.
* The total income does not include gate receipts, revenue from merchandising and prize money.

zyakaira notes: this being an official study, we will be using this to work on all things IPL here and at http://twitterone.mobi

All IPL brands have earned 150-200 crores in 2009 edition with 110 million viewers ratifying the IPL’s tag of 8200 crores ($1.3 bllion) for media rights. Now apart from their going public, i feel the potential is such that at least a couple of these franchises like the Daredevils will start earning closer to 300 crores from edition 3

via Brand valuation | How the teams fared

Any Screens Necessary: Mediapost Publications

Omniture can help you here

YOUR VIDEO ANALYTICS CHAMPION: OMNITURE

“UPDATED AUG 15, 2009: #Omniture tops the Forrester Wave in #Web Analytics per #destinationCRM. Nice! http://ping.fm/egJEa

Thanks to “strong” brand marketing and major media events like the Presidential inauguration, the Super Bowl and the NCAAs college basketball finals, online video usage among U.S. consumer grew 13% year-over-year and mobile jumped more than 50%, according to new data from Nielsens “Three Screen” report.

But while consumers are increasingly choosing to watch video on the “best screen available,” traditional TV remains the screen of choice, according to the quarterly analysis from Nielsens A2/M2 “Anywhere Anytime Media Measurement” initiative.

During the first quarter, the average American watched approximately 153 hours of TV every month at home, which represented a 1.2% increase year-over-year.

Between work and home, the 131 million Americans who watched video online consumed an average of about 3 hours of video each month. The 13.4 million Americans who watch video on mobile phones, meanwhile, watched an average of about 3.5 hours of mobile video each month. Overall, Nielsen found that consumers time with TV, Internet and Mobile video continues to increase across the board.

Looking ahead, with the continued adoption of broadband and new technology, Nielsen expects online video audiences to continue growing.

Mobile video viewing has grown a significant 52% from the previous year, up to 13.4 million Americans. “Much of this growth continues to come from increased mobile content and the rise of the mobile web as a viewing option,” the report suggests.

Of all different age groups, 18- to-24-year-olds show signs of watching DVR and online video the same amount of time — “time-shifting” 5 hours, 47 minutes per month, and watching video online 5 hours, 3 minutes each month.

Wow, you are not alone - Part 365

zyakaira/zyalinked notes (twitterone.com) : Readers are welcome to read and get going with their Video Analytics strategy with Aseem and the Consulting team at Omniture. The team is on my Linked In network.

via Any Screens Necessary: TV, Internet and Mobile Viewing All Up.

Facebook | Videos Posted by Zoozoo: Making of Vodafone Exam results TV Commercial

The making of Vodafone Exam Results.You’ve loved the ad. Now see what went into its making.I hope you re a facebook user , as you will need to be : Link to Video and Zoozoozs on FB, Vodafone ZooZoos at the IPL Superbowl Here is the http://advantages.us page on Facebook if you want to visit us: Our Facebook Page

Newsweek Interviews Tim Geithner Live on Facebook

May 18th, 2009 | by Adam Ostrow

mashable.com
We’ve talked a lot recently about how brands can use Facebookfor engaging with their customers. Today, a glimpse of how media companies can further interact with their audience on Facebook by way of Newsweek, who is using their Page on the social network to broadcast a live interview of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner with Editor Jon Meacham.

The video itself – which is being filmed at the National Press Club – is being delivered by UStream. The Facebook component, however, works just like the Pages of brands. Newsweek has developed a custom tab on their Page that includes the video stream, and under it, is allowing Facebook users to leave comments.

Further, like the updates that brands push out to their fans, Newsweek’s message that they’re interviewing the Treasury Secretary is visible to the magazine’s fans on Facebook via their homepage.

As Justin Smith notes, this interview likely appeals to a “slightly different demographic than your ‘traditional’ Facebook user.” And Newsweek seems like a relative newcomer to Facebook, sporting only a bit more than 3,000 fans.

But it’s yet another example of how big brands are using Facebook Pages to connect with customers, and how we’ll increasingly see applications integrated to make Pages not just a medium for broadcasting messages, but also destination sites for providing content and interaction.

via Newsweek Interviews Tim Geithner Live on Facebook.

mashable gets the advantages.us experts?

Twitterati (Top 100 Celebration) bubbletweet

‘You ain’t seen nothing yet’ tool for the Twitterati

Our contribution to progress, the internet voted for me :)

Thinking if I can help tsunami victims somewhere, till then it is the #IPL in South Africa. Check and Please participate in this poll

Who will make it to the finals?

Who will make it to the finals?

Google Talking To New York Times, Washington Post About… Something | Peter Kafka | MediaMemo | AllThingsD

Remember last week, when Google was forced to explain why it wasn’t single-handedly destroying American newspapers?

Turns out the company is in talks with some of the country’s biggest newspapers to… well, save them isn’t the right phrase. In fact, it’s not clear how to describe the talks. But we do know that Google GOOG is chatting with both the Washington Post WPO and the New York Times NYT, because that’s what employees of the Washington Post and the New York Times are reporting today.

Here’s the Post’s Howard Kurtz, in column this morning castigating newspapers for being too slow to react to the Web:

Post Co. chief executive Donald Graham and Google chief executive Eric Schmidt and their lieutenants have been holding talks about a possible collaboration. This could range from creating new Web pages to technological tools for journalists or readers. Hanging over the talks is the reality that the search giant, while funneling vital traffic to news sites, vacuums up their content without paying a dime.

Post executive Philip Bennett confirmed the discussions, saying: “We’re talking to each other about improved ways of creating and presenting news online.” He calls it “an informal collaboration” that “has produced some interesting ideas already. I’d say that on the journalism side of the conversation we’ve learned a lot.”

Here’s a Google spokesperson’s description of the meeting, for what it’s worth: “This was an informal meeting, and we’re always talking with publishers to find new and creative ways to help them make money from compelling online content.”

Internet Marketing News | Marketing Pilgrim

Google Tops List of Global Brands; Pampers Not Too Crappy at #31

Each year Millward Brown compiles its Brandz Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands pdf. For the past three years Google has sat atop of the list and this year has the distinction of being the first $100 billion brand.

Outside the Top 10, but showing impressive growth in brand equity, are Blackberry #16, up 100%, Amazon #26, up 85% and AT&T #28, up 67%.

Top 100 brands. Will they Twitter?

The highest new entry is Pampers #31. Pertinent don’t you think, considering our economy is down the crapper?

via Internet Marketing News | Marketing Pilgrim.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.