Maximizing the ROI on Your Super Bowl Spot – Advertising Age – Digital

 

The plot has thickened for Super Bowl ads in 2009. The economy is hurting, skepticism of advertising is in no short supply, and the price is $3 million for a 30-second spot.

 

 

Go for it? Or run for the hills? Moreover, if you do take the plunge, what can you do to maximize your return on investment? Is past prologue, or are there new variables to consider?

 

 

Super Bowl spots today need to pass two distinct tests — one measurable and traditional, and the other based on unique dynamics of cross-platform engagement, most notably buzz and conversation.

 

 

Lets start with more-familiar turf. On a pure impression basis, one could well argue that the Super Bowl — the one special day when we actually “celebrate” advertising — is such an unusual magnet for consumer attention and recall that it is worth every penny.

 

 

Indeed, curiosity, anticipation, guessing and nostalgia come into play big time. Consumers want to see the ads; theyre akin to entertainment. In the past three years, Nielsen IAG research disclosure: Nielsen cuts my check found that Super Bowl spots achieved 31% higher breakthrough and 93% higher likability than the typical TV ad. On top of that, the spots typically receive an unusually generous layer of free media and other buzz before the game.

 

 

But its not that simple. Timing is also a factor, according to IAG. First- and second-quarter spots yield better recall than second-half spots. And fourth-quarter spots are roughly comparable to a “normal” TV buy. Viewers ability to associate the correct brand with the ad and reported likability levels similarly wane over the course of the game.

 

 

But the other critical variable, increasingly relevant today, is how this much-anticipated creative performs beyond commonly accepted TV metrics.

 

 

Indeed, TV can no longer be viewed in a vacuum, and the Super Bowl involves a far more complicated mix of marketing activity and user engagement. Great copy finds life in other places, from the water cooler to YouTube. Moreover, if managed properly and holistically, Super Bowl ads can benefit from a “latency” effect that rewards the brand in perpetuity via search results.

 

 

via Maximizing the ROI on Your Super Bowl Spot – Advertising Age – Digital.

Facebook Crushing MySpace in Traffic – Advertising Age – Digital

 

Advertising? Not So Much, by Michael Learmonth

 

 

Published: January 23, 2009

 

 

NEW YORK AdAge.com — Want to know which is becoming the worlds default social network? Hint: Its not MySpace. ComScore data is out and on a global basis Facebook is pulling away.

 

 

Facebook and MySpace were the same size in terms of unique users in June, but since then Facebook has exploded, growing at more than 10% a month while MySpace has remained stagnant. As of November, Facebook had more than 200 million unique users, about twice the size of MySpaces 100 million. TechCrunch charted the last 12 months, and for MySpace its not a pretty picture.

 

 

This is due largely to users overseas, where Facebook is growing fast. In the U.S., MySpace is still the bigger social network, but not by much and probably not for long. The difference, as MySpace execs point out, is that the News Corp-owned social network sells quite a bit of advertising, and Facebook, well, not so much.

Jay Leno’s Move Hints at Future of Prime-Time TV – NYTimes.com

With one sweeping shift this week, the ailing NBC network reordered the playing field of prime-time television. The introduction of a five-night-a-week program starring Mr. Leno, beginning next fall, was a concession that TV norms cannot continue, at least not at fourth-place NBC.

The programming and viewing habits of the last 50 years — exemplified by the checkerboard of competing programs on the broadcast networks — are being replaced by an Internet-influenced time-shifting model of scheduling. As a result, the very definition of prime time may be changing.

“We do have to continue to rethink what a broadcast network is,” Jeffrey Zucker, the chief executive of NBC Universal, a unit of General Electric, said at an industry conference Monday, hours before the news of Mr. Leno’s new assignment emerged. He warned that if changes were not undertaken, “the broadcast networks will end up like the newspaper business or, worse, like the car companies.” Maybe Mr. Zucker has seen the future; after all, his network has lost 50 percent of its 10 p.m. audience in the last three years.

The announcement of Mr. Leno’s show continues to reverberate on studio lots and executive corridors here, as the Monday-through-Friday “strip” is unprecedented in the modern network television era. NBC framed the decision in terms of competitiveness and cost-effectiveness, because it defuses the risk of Mr. Leno’s move to another network and saves untold millions of dollars a year. But it also reflects the increasing irrelevance of the network schedule.

The irrelevance is partly because of digital video recorders, the bane of many a television executive. Viewers in the 28 percent of homes with DVRs are recording programs at 8 and 9 p.m. and playing them back later in the evening, hurting the 10 p.m. hour. Of the 10 prime-time programs that gained the biggest audience from DVR usage this year, none were on at 10 p.m.

The biggest gainers from DVR viewership were dramas. According to statistics on time-shifting released by Nielsen Media Research on Friday, the NBC series “Heroes” benefited the most from DVRs, with a 35 percent increase in its audience after seven days of time-shifted viewing. The new Fox drama “Fringe” experienced a 26 percent increase, and the ABC series “Lost” had a 25 percent increase.

via Jay Leno’s Move Hints at Future of Prime-Time TV – NYTimes.com.

Guy Kawasaki tweet | TVWeek.com

Younger Americans More Likely to Use Internet TV Than DVR, Study Says

By Daisy Whitney

Internet television is trumping digital video recorders as an on-demand device for the younger generation, according to the latest findings from research firm Solutions Research Group.

The study found that 70% of online Americans in the 18- to 34-year-old demographic have watched TV online at some point, compared to 36% who have viewed a show on a DVR or a TiVo. That suggests the young Web users will increasingly watch their shows on the Web rather than via traditional means.

In fact, the number of online Americans watching television shows on the Web has doubled in the last two years. Half of Internet users in the U.S. have watched a TV show on the Web, up from one-quarter in the fall of 2006.

The data comes from a study conducted in November of 1,200 Americans age 12 and older.

SRG also reported that awareness of Hulu.com is on the upswing, with 24% of online Americans now familiar with the News Corp./NBC Universal-owned site, up from 15% in the summer. The site still skews male, however: Two-thirds of its visitors are men and their average age is 33. That’s good news for advertisers, because the 18-34 male demo is hard to reach on TV.

Did Twitter pass Digg | Techcrunch

twitter-obama-dayDid Twitter Just Pass Digg?
53 Comments
by Erick Schonfeld on January 20, 2009

According to Hitwise, last week visits to Twitter surpassed visits to Digg for the first time. Hitwise measures visits in terms of “market share,” which isn’t a very helpful metric (both have 0.021 percent market share, but Twitter is ranked No. 84 and Digg is No. 85). This data is of last week, when visits to Twitter surged following the much-Tweeted emergency landing of a plane on the Hudson. (Note that these numbers do not include usage on mobile devices, desktop apps, or through other Websites via Twitter’s API).

Today, traffic to Twitter was even higher with everybody feeling compelled to let everyone else know that, yes, in fact, the U.S. has a new president and that they saw his inauguration speech. (You too?) Twitter co-founder Biz Stone blogs that Twitter saw five times as many Tweets per second today compared to last week. (See chart here). So maybe those two lines between Digg and Twitter will keep diverging, or at least keep converging.

For what it’s worth, Google Trends for Websites also shows Twitter catching up to Digg (but not yet passing). Other measuring services, such as Quantcast, Compete, and comScore, still show a wide gap. For instance, in the U.S. for December, comScore shows Digg.com at 6.8 million unique visitors versus 1.9 million for Twitter.com.. That’s a pretty big gap to bridge in less than one month. I don’t buy the Hitwise numbers. Do you?

zyakaira notes: with due apologies to techcrunch, i do believe these hitwise nos. I do. Twitter’s pretty neat.

Social | Marketing Pilgrim

Just a few weeks ago we reported that Facebook was growing by 600,000 users a day. If that wasn’t enough, CNET reports that Facebook set record traffic numbers on Christmas Eve.

During the month of November, Facebook was averaging 1.42% of all U.S. Internet traffic. On December 24, they hit a Facebook-best 2.18% market share that day. That’s a 54 percent increase over November average and a 53 percent increase year over year. Needless to say, things are going well for them.

According to CNET, that pattern was mirrored in the U.K., where visits to the social networking site had a market share of 4.65 percent, accounting for one in every 22 Internet visits.

As for what is causing this strong traffic increase, Heather Hopkins of Hitwise theorizes it was a combination of boredom and bad weather. Facebook’s primary markets (New York, Chicago, Washington, Boston, and Philadelphia) were all slammed with bad weather.

via Social | Marketing Pilgrim.

Tracking User Sat on Twitter | TVWeek

When a Hulu user posted a message on Twitter earlier this month about “terrible performance problems” on the Fox-NBC online video site, a Hulu executive replied with an e-mail address and an offer to fix the problem.

That’s because Hulu’s employees conduct daily Internet searches to learn what’s being said about Hulu on Twitter, the popular microblogging service.

Twitter is quickly emerging as an important social media channel that lets companies listen to and interact with users. A handful of television networks and shows have experimented with the service, and online video destinations such as Veoh and Hulu are actively leaning on Twitter to communicate with their viewers. Other sites, including Crackle, say they plan to devote more resources to monitoring Twitter “chatter” in the coming year.

As social media becomes a more powerful communication vehicle for consumers, savvy brands are tracking online buzz to learn what they’re doing right and wrong. For online video sites, the practice is crucial—they live and die by the Internet and need to know whether their sites are working well or not.

“If anyone has an issue with latency or streaming and they talk out to the Twitter universe, we will reach out to them,” said Jason Kilar, CEO of Hulu. “Someone said recently they were getting ready to watch Hulu and they had some trouble, so I e-mailed them [and] said, ‘I’d love to hear more about it,’ and connected them to our chief technology officer. That’s something you couldn’t do without Twitter.”

Hulu also uses the microblogging service to post occasional updates on new features and content. In addition, Mr. Kilar tracks Hulu mentions on Twitter via the Twitter search service Summize.com. He said Hulu now generates about 30 mentions on Twitter every hour compared to 30 per day earlier this year.

That sort of heady word-of-mouth uptick is one of the reasons Hulu usage shot up in October, when the site delivered 206 million streams of video to 9 million unique users, up from 142 million streams to 6.3 million unique users in September, according to Nielsen Online.

Veoh executives also chat with users via Twitter, blogs and forums. Earlier this month the site’s founder, Dmitry Shapiro, posted a Twitter update asking for feedback on the redesigned site.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 19,779 other followers